Yesterday I came across a Chinese demonstration outside the State Library in Swanston Street, Melbourne, calling on Australians to support the Olympics in Beijing. The message was that the Western media has distorted the events surrounding Tibet. After all, the banners told us, Tibet was, is and always will be part of China.
It appears as though a large proportion of the Chinese people (Han) believe that Tibet always has been part of China. Clearly the history books don’t offer much insight into the complexity that is Tibet, let alone China as a whole. Tibet was ruled by local kings from the seventh to eleventh century AD. Tibet was invaded, like much of China, by Mongol rulers in 1240 AD. In the early 18th century AD Tibet came under the sovereignty of the Qing dynasty, with the Dalai Lamas taking a leadership role recognised by the Chinese.
In 1903 the British Empire, competing for supremacy with the growing Russian empire, invaded Tibet. Thousands of Tibetans were massacred by the British troops. The British and Russians signed treaties with China, recognising that Tibet was under Chinese sovereignty.
After the fall of the Qing dynasty in 1912 Tibet asserted a new independence from Chinese rule. It wasn’t until 1950 when troops of the People’s Republic of China invaded Tibet that the region once again came under the Chinese banner. The Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, signed in Beijing in 1951 by representatives of Tibet and China, established a framework in which would allow the Tibetan people the right of exercising national regional autonomy under the unified leadership of the Central People’s Government. The Dalai Lama was allowed his place in the leadership of Tibet, until a rebellion in 1959.
Simple campaigns with simple slogans do distort and diminish the portrayal of truth. Closer examination of the stories behind the stories reveals that more people are implicated in the flattening of history than we realise.
Brian McLaren’s new book, Everything Must Change: Jesus, Global Change and Revolution of Hope, is coming out in October. He’s provided a few samples from the book on YouTube.
The first video comes from the introduction. Be aware that the last 50 seconds of the video allow you time to reflect on what you’ve just heard…
A reading from chapter 24, reflecting on materialistic culture and the pressure to keep up with the latest.
An explanation of the title of the new book…
Brian talks about some of the examples of deep shift he’s been looking for…
From Brian McLaren’s Deep Shift site, he explains the background to the book and the speaking tour he’s doing around its publication…
We Are In Deep Shift.
A time of transition, rethinking, re-imagining, and re-envisioning. A time for asking new questions
and seeking answers that are both new and old, fresh and seasoned, surprising and familiar.
What does it mean, in today’s world, to be a follower of God in the way of Jesus?
What does it mean to be a faith community engaged in the holistic, integral mission of God in our world today?
How do we, as individuals and faith communities, respond faithfully to the crises facing our world?
What is our duty to God, ourselves, our families, our neighbors, our enemies, and our planet in light of Jesus’ radical message of the kingdom of God?
How can we engage in personal formation and theological reformulation for global transformation?
A number of churches around Sydney this last week have put up signs saying “Jesus Loves Osama”, with the words from Matthew 5:44, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you”. Churches involved include Central Baptist and St Clement’s Anglican Church, Marrickville. I first heard about the story when ABC Radio Gold Coast rang up asking for some comments for their morning show tomorrow morning. The campaign has been organised by Outreach Media.
Andrew Bolt at the Herald Sun has provoked quite a conversation by linking the poster with Michael Leunig’s question, “Might we, can we, find a place in our heart for the humanity of Osama bin Laden and those others? On Christmas Day can we consider their suffering, their children and the possibility that they too have their goodness? It is a family day, and Osama is our relative.”
So does Jesus love Osama? I asked that question on the night of the September 11 bombings. At a memorial service on the Gold Coast we put up images from the web showing the destruction and horror of the day, along with pictures of human compassion and courage amid the suffering. We also had a photograph of Osama Bin Laden. I had the challenge of weaving into the prayers thoughts for this man and his colleagues.
1. Which Osama?
We assume they’re talking about Osama Bin Laden, the ringleader of the Al Quaeda. Of course there are thousands of people in the world called Osama. It’s a bit like saying “Jesus loves George”. So there’s nothing special about being called Osama then…
2. What is it about Osama Bin Laden that makes this statement neccessary?
We’re aware of Osama Bin Laden’s track record in sponsoring an underground revolution in Afghanistan, forcing Russian troops out of his country. And we’re aware of Osama Bin Laden’s track record in resourcing and training militants in campaigns of resistance and terrorism around the world, including the September 11 2001 bombing of the Trade Center Twin Towers in New York City. There are people who share the passions of Osama Bin Laden. There are people who are loved by Osama. But for many people this character does not qualify for the ‘lovable’ category.
3. What is it about Jesus that makes this statement possible?
Looking at Jesus’ track record we discover a tendency to search out people who have been rejected by their peers. In some cases he’s befriended people who have been spurned because of their despicable actions. In other cases it’s people who have been unfairly treated. What appears to be consistent is Jesus’ capacity for undeserved mercy (grace) for ’sinners’.
4. What kind of love are we talking about?
A common interpretation of the word ‘love’ is centred on the concept of affection and fondness. “I love that guy”. With that meaning inserted into the “Jesus loves Osama” statement we have a distorted perception of Osama, Jesus and love. The kind of love consistently shown by Jesus is more about the capacity of our creator to engage with creation with compassion, concern and call for renewal. This is the kind of love that sees beyond our perceived aggrievances and sees God’s gift of humanity even in the lives of abusive men and women. Jesus forgave even those who treated him unfairly and brought about his death. “Father forgive them for they know not what they do”. Abd yet God’s love is not about blind tolerance of destructive attitudes or behaviour. Jesus was not shy about calling people to model their lives on his compassionate love.
5. Can love go with the use of violence to prevent further destructive behaviour?
I think so. I would prefer that to embarking on a campaign of hate.
So what would you say in response to the statement, “Jesus loves Osama?”
Olaf Wiig, one of the hostages recently released in the Gaza strip, says that being a Kiwi saved his life.
Last night on Close Up, on New Zealand’s TV One channel, Wiig talked about the two weeks in which he and US reporter Steve Centanni were held captive by the Holy Jihad Brigades. When the kidnappers accused Wiig and Centanni of being implicated in American oppression of Muslim Palestinians, Wiig said, “Dude, I’m not American, I’m a New Zealander”. He explained that New Zealand had a difficult relationship with the US, did not support war in the Middle East, and had no soldiers there. “We’re a different sort of people altogether”.
Wiig said that the conversation ended with the abductors saying “We realise you’re a New Zealander, we know New Zealand doesn’t kill Muslims. Unfortunately you’re with a very very dangerous American and we’re going to kill him”.
Centanni, obviously, would not have been glad to hear that news. Olaf kept the accusations to himself until after their release. The fact was Centanni was working for Fox, an American news conglomerate owned by an Australian-born naturalized American, Rupert Murdoch. Maybe these guys were getting Centanni to stand in for Murdoch? Centanni did work as an embedded journalist with the Navy SEALs during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq.
Olaf Wiig is a NZ born freelance photographer living in Sussex, England. Through this kidnapping ordeal he’s earned himself a Wikipedia entry.
I used to work in the same building as Olaf’s father, Roger Wiig, at that time editor of Crosslink, the newspaper for the Presbyterian and Methodist denominations in New Zealand. Last I heard Roger was living over in the UK, after a stint here in Brisbane. The world is full of Post Kiwis!
Nebuchadnezzar, (Derek Barry) a resident of Wooloowin in Brisbane, has posted some very helpful stories this week, with insightful comments on the passing of the Maori Queen, the newly launched blog of Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Queensland going to the polls, and the proposed legislation on assylum seekers hoping to enter Australia.
Te Arikinui Dame Te Atairangikaahu died on Tuesday at the age of 75, after a reign of more than 40 years. Dame Te Ata was the longest serving head of the Kingitanga movement - the royal line, which started almost 150 years ago in an effort to stem the loss of native lands to the flood of white settlers arriving in New Zealand. I’m sure it was only a couple of weeks ago I was reading about representatives of the Methodist Church of New Zealand attending celebrations of Dame Te Ata’s anniversary.
On Monday Al Jazeera announced Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, has started his own blog. Iranians found out about this after it was announced on state TV on Sunday and they urged members of the public to send the president written messages through the website. Nebuchadnezzar writes about the difficulty the average Iranian has when trying to publish a blog. Despite the roll-out of broadband, censorship is alive and well in Iran.
The Australian Reserve Bank announced yesterday a further increase in interest rates, taking us up a quarter of a percent to 6%. Which means we’ll be getting a letter from the bank shortly informing us that our monthly payments need to increase again. Last time this happened I didn’t bother changing the automatic payment, figuring that it would need to change again shortly. I was right. So I’m just putting more and more into the mortgage via BPay.
We’re being told in the Australian press that the inflation increase is due to the cost of oil/petrol and the cost of bananas. Bananas are around $10 a kilogram in the supermarkets - have been since Cyclone Larry hit North Queensland. But I’d say that even without banana shortages we’d be facing this interest rate rise. It’s an international phenomenon this week.
Megan McCardle at Instapundit says that high oil prices are a big part of this. But she says there’s another part of the story.
“The entrance of China (and to a lesser extent India) into the global labour market has effectively held down prices in developed countries, even when those economies are running at full capacity. Economic bottlenecks and problems with the financial system in China are making it harder for China to effectively export deflation (deflation is the opposition of inflation), which means consumer prices may rise still further.
That, in turn, is forcing central banks to raise interest rates even when the economy isn’t that strong. Both the European Central Bank and the Bank of England did so today, and while the former was all-but-foreordained, the latter move was a big surprise to everyone.”
Walking past a memorial service in Surfers Paradise this morning reminded me that today is the 64th anniversary of the Battle of the Coral Sea. On May 7 - 8, 1942, Japanese, USA and Australian aircraft carrier forces fought a battle in the waters southwest of the Solomon Islands and east of New Guinea. That battle has become a focus point for Australian-USA defense relationships.
The Japanese were attempting to capture Port Moresby, on the southeastern coast of New Guinea, close to North East Australia. The US Navy discovered the Japanese invasion plan and moved ships into the Coral Sea to take on the flotilla. Both sides lost ships in the ensuing battle. However the US/Australia force managed to prevent the invasion of Port Moresby and eliminated enough ships to make possible a victory in the later Battle of Midway, a month later.
My first interest in the Battle of the Coral Sea developed when I was working at Robina Uniting Church. We held a special service on the Sunday morning, inviting members of the veterans association and honouring the American-Australian connection. I was in charge of sourcing imagery for the service. While working in Cairns in 2004/5 I was living on Coral Sea coast. Northern Territory and North Queensland residents felt very vulnerable during World War II. Having lived there, so far away from the rest of Australia, I can understand the fear of being abandoned that still lingers there.
I’ve just received an email from Forbes promoting Rich Karlgaard’s book, “Life 2.0: How People Across America Are Transforming Their Lives by Finding the Where of Their Happiness.” It’s the story of Karlgaard’s flight across America in a small plane visiting people who have moved to small towns.
What caught my eye was the fact the email’s subject begins, “Rick Warren Recommends Life 2.0″.
Rick Warren writes:
Never in history has any other group of people had as much freedom to choose where they want to live as Americans do today:
Our government gives us the liberty to live wherever we want.
Our prosperity gives us the capacity to live wherever we want,
Our technology gives us the ability to live wherever we want, and,
Our diverse American landscape gives us the opportunity to live wherever we want. You can choose practically any climate, any environment, and any population density and still live in America.
This is a privilege that should not be wasted. There is no reason for most Americans to live in a place they dislike, or is harmful to their health, their soul, or their family. We are free to move.
How poignant, how ironic, in the wake of the forced exile of thousands of residents of New Orleans. Many of those residents will find it difficult to live where they want - back in New Orleans. Not all of us have the capacity to get up and move where we want.
Emergent’s email newsletter on Sunday was appropriately named Emergent/C this week, with some very helpful suggestions relating to the emergency in the Mexico Gulf region.
Chris Seay, from Ecclesia in Houston Texas is looking for a place to host a home for displaced children. He gives the links for a video clip using footage of people affected by the New Orleans flooding, infused with the feeling of exile expressed in Psalm 137. Lori Chaffer, of Waterdeep, sings the track, “Please don’t make me sing this”. The video was put together by VJ Travis Reed of Highway Video.
Duncan Macleod posts on life, faith and culture in Australia, drawing from his involvement in the creative industry, the Uniting Church, the blogosphere, generational research, the emerging church and life on the Gold Coast.
Te Arikinui Dame Te Atairangikaahu died on Tuesday at the age of 75, after a reign of more than 40 years. Dame Te Ata was the longest serving head of the Kingitanga movement - the royal line, which started almost 150 years ago in an effort to stem the loss of native lands to the flood of white settlers arriving in New Zealand. I’m sure it was only a couple of weeks ago I was reading about representatives of the Methodist Church of New Zealand attending celebrations of Dame Te Ata’s anniversary.
I’ve just received an email from 
