Transformed By Truth in Purpose

People need more than bread for their life;
They must feed on every word of God.
Matthew 4:4 (New Living Translation)

God’s… gracious Word can make you into what he wants you to be and give you everything you could possibly need.
Acts 20:32 (The Message)

Driving with Purpose

Day 24 in The Purpose Driven Life is one day’s reading I’m not going to find easy to write up. I clearly am coming from a different place than Rick Warren when it comes to thinking about the Bible. But I’m sure we have a lot in common still.

Like many Christians around the world, Rick directly equates God’s Word with the Bible. Like many Christians around the world, I don’t agree with that simple equation, “God’s Word = Holy Bible”.

I don’t believe the Bible is alive. It is not the fourth member of the Trinity. But I passionately and thoughtfully believe that the Holy Spirit is alive, speaking to us in so many ways. And I believe that the Scriptures are used by the Holy Spirit to guide us, motivate us, and give us hope. Above all, they are used by the Holy Spirit to help us connect with Jesus Christ, the Word of God – the one through whom God communicates with us.

Rick says we must accept the authority of the Bible rather than basing our choices on unreliable authorities such as culture, tradition, reason or emotion. All four are flawed by the Fall, he says.

From what I can see as I read the Bible, the stories described within and the ways in which they are written up reflect cultural perspectives, the passing on of tradition, the development of thought about God, as well as a lot of emotion. On top of that, we use all those as we read and interpret the Bible. I agree – these are all flawed by our limited experience as well as our tendency to deceive ourselves. I think the writers of the material put together in the Hebrew and Christian scriptures, as much as they were inspired by the Spirit, were flawed and limited.

I think we should read the Bible with humility, listening carefully to the insights we bring with us from culture, tradition, reason and emotion.

Rick says I must assimilate the truth of the Bible. This is done by receiving God’s Word and accepting it with an open, receptive attitude. It is done by reading the Bible daily – so that we get to read of all of it often. It is done by researching or studying the Bible. It is done by remembering the Bible – memorising parts that will help us. It is done by reflecting on the Bible – meditating on it.

Hey I’m committed to the same principles, though I have found that legalism or driven attitudes around them do not bring life. I place my life under the authority of Jesus. I know that he doesn’t rule my life with a list of ‘must do every day’ tasks. His agenda for my life spans days, weeks, months and years.

The opening verse makes sense to me when I read it as:
“Jesus Christ can make you into what he wants you to be and give you everything you could possibly need.”

Rick says I must apply the principles of God’s Word. I like his suggestion that we write down an action step after reading the Bible. An action step that is personal (involving me), practical (something I can do), and provable (with a deadline to do it). That would be a useful tool to use in reading the Bible. It certainly helps avoid just growing in understanding without any application in real life.

Rick’s final question is helpful.

What has God already told me in his Word that I haven’t started doing yet? If I read “his Word” as Jesus Christ, it would become: “What has God already told me in Jesus Christ that I haven’t started doing yet?”

Hugh Mackay on Lucky Generation of Australia

Generations by Hugh MackayHugh Mackay’s Generations was published by Pan Macmillan Australia in 1997. It’s now out of print but is in most Australian libraries. In this research-based book Mackay gives us three slices of Australian life by describing the ‘Lucky’ Generation – born in the 1920s, the ‘Stress’ Generation – born in 1946-1955, and the ‘Options’ Generation, born in the 1970s.

In this post, I am engaging with the second chapter on the ‘Lucky Generation’ – the tribal elders.

A word of caution right from the start. This is a slice, not the whole cohort. What about the people born in the 1930s and 1940s? Mackay acknowledges right at the start (pp. 3-4) that he has narrowed down 25 years into ten years. These smaller cohorts, Mackay writes, are symbolic of the changes in Australian attitudes.

To compare Mackay’s analysis with the Meredith and Schewe’s schema, the Lucky Generation would correspond with the World War II cohort, coming of age during the war years, but too young to serve overseas. Missing in the Mackay approach is a whole cohort who came of age in the late 1940s and 1950s. It could be argued that the ‘missing cohort’ did not have a binding experience to differentiate them from the ‘lucky’ ones and so tended to reflect the values of their elder ‘brothers and sisters’.

Mackay starts with the meaning behind his description:

Lucky – charmed – because of timing of each of the phases of their journey through the life cycle. Their lives begin in hardship (childhood), but blossom during their middle years.

Values learnt from a depression childhood

Loyalty
Saving
The work ethic
Sense of mutual obligation
Patriotism

Values learnt from a wartime adolescence

Strong community spirit
National identity – linked with ‘Britishness’
Pride in Australian capacity to take its place in the war

Values lived out in the Post-war Boom

Optimism – hope for a new egalitarian middle-class Australia
Openness to new immigrants based on expected assimilation
Early marriage
Demand for new housing – in new suburbs

Parenting the Boomers

Mackay tells us that his focus groups of ‘lucky’ Australians felt good about progress in parenting. It was because they didn’t have to work so hard to make a living – they had more time for family in the suburbs. Parents, more educated now, were less rigid and authoritarian. Societal attitudes towards children rewarded parents who valued their children as people. Mackay inserts a rider provided by the Boomer focus groups who felt that it was they who made the real progress as parents. ‘Lucky’ parents look back and wonder if they over indulged their children, succumbing to an emerging materialism.

‘Lucky Women’

Mackay points out that it was possible for women to leave paid employment at the birth of their first child, and never to go back. This was an exciting development for the Lucky generation who had gone through an unstable decade of economic turmoil in which ‘stay at home’ mums would have been working without technological aids to make ends meet. In their latter years, the women of the Lucky generation have to grapple with the independent approaches of the Boomer women. On the one hand they are glad that their daughters have a greater capacity to negotiate the terms of their marriages and leave them if need be. But the complexity and stress linked with unclear gender roles seems to puzzle many of the older generation.

Society seems to be deteriorating

At the turn of the twenty first century the Lucky Generation report a sense of insecurity.
Lack of physical safety – linked to fear of going out at night
Disappointment – uneasiness about the loss of integrity in society, loss of shared moral values, loss of sense of belonging to a community.

Three Biggest Changes

  1. Television – most were already raising a family when they bought their first TV.
  2. Widespread Car Ownership – symbolic of a general shift from public to private space, the rise of the individual and the extraordinary emphasis placed on travel in the last quarter of the 20th century.
  3. Kids Living Together – Mackay reports that his focus groups were proud of the fact they had been able to develop a generally tolerant attitude toward sexual liberation among their own children and grandchildren. This is alongside their pride at their own more solemn approach to marriage. But yet they are still critical of the concept of instant gratification.

Warnings for the future

Mackay finishes with a few warnings from the Lucky ones:

  • Too many values have evaporated in the face of relentless materialism
  • Too many working mothers are neglecting their children and destablising both family and the labour market
  • The idea of self-sacrifice has been lost
  • Technology is clever but hardly likely to be our salvation
  • Instant gratification is a dangerous trap

Lucky Authors

The chapter finishes with a reference to two spokesmen for the Lucky Generation of Australia.

Ronald Conway, author of “The Great Australian Stupor: An Interpretation of an Australian Way of Life”, suggests that this no-nonsense, self reliant generation may be the last of the ‘bed-rock’ generations on which something distinctive and enduring can be built.

Lucky Country Donald HorneDonald Horne is author of “The Lucky Country”, first published in 1964 and revised in 1998. Horne warns his own generation that their prosperity has been more to do with luck than with good management or enlightened thinking. His book provides a radical critique of the philistinism, provincialism and dependence of Australian society.

Mackay remarks on the fact that this generation have benefited from low taxation when raising their own families, and are now the generation who enjoy the provisions of a generous age provision.

Recognition

Mackay had the privilege of sitting with these tribal elders. We have the privilege of having their insights passed on to us. Even though I grew up in New Zealand, I recognise much of the portrait of the Lucky Generation in the lives of my parents, both of whom were born in the 1920s. The only remarkable difference would be the absence of Holden as an icon of widespread car ownership.

NZ Highlands

Duncan Macleod above the Matukituki Valley

Up in the Highlands of NZ’s Southern Alps – at the age of 30. If my memory serves me right, this is looking down on the Matukituki Valley, a detour off the Rees and Dart Valleys circuit. I vividly remember sitting there eating a swiss bread sandwich I’d made with sliced apple to make up for the lack of moisture. To my right, out of the photo, was Don McConnochie, fellow theological student from Dunedin.

Blogging as Pacific Highlander

This blog arises out of a conversation with my 15 year old daughter, a dedicated Live Journalist. It was a conversation had in real time during a walk in our actual neighbourhood by the way.

Where do I put the parts of my life that don’t fit with TV adverts, my reading, my professional work? What about reflections on the day? What about what I’m listening to? Who I’m talking to? Where do my various blogs meet each other?

I went back to my first ever blog – which lasted a day by the way – deleted it and started it over again. So ‘Pacific Highlander’ lives again!

Pacific Highlander Header

Why the title? Obviously “Highlander” fits in with the TV series, starring Adrian Paul as Duncan MacLeod, a 400 year old immortal. There are six series, all available now on DVD. ‘Pacific’ refers partly to where I live, near the Pacific Ocean. Also to the meaning of ‘pacific’ which is peaceful or peace making. ‘Duncan’ means ‘brown warrior’ or ‘brown leader’. I’m a member of Pacific Parks Uniting, a network of house churches on the Gold Coast.

Enough for just now. Need to go and fix up the template.

Hugh Mackay on Generations

Hugh MackayI’ve been to a couple of Australian workshops on generations based almost entirely on Hugh Mackay’s book, “Generations: Baby Boomers, their Parents & their Children”. The biggest reason for this is the Australian base for Hugh’s research. This is not just an Australian take on American research. It’s the result of Hugh’s qualitative research over 40 years, conducted in conversation with small groups in living rooms around Australia.

Hugh Mackay was born in 1938, which makes him just a bit older than the Boomers he’s aiming at with his book. Hugh is a psychologist, social researcher and writer. Hugh has written several novels and books and is a weekly newspaper columnist – for the Sydney Morning Herald, Sun Herald and more recently for The Age.

For the past 27 years Hugh has been publishing his findings in the quarterly research series, The Mackay Report. Since September 2003 the Mackay Report has been brought out by Ipsos Australia, an international marketing research company. To get onto the mailing list you’re looking at between $4800 AU for charitable organisations and $9700 for regular subscriptions. Of particular interest this year (2005) is the report on ‘Whither the Baby Boomers’, due out in September. Hugh will be presenting the report in Melbourne on September 27 and Sydney on October 6.

Here’s the appetiser for the September 2005 Mackay Report:

In 2005, the oldest baby boomers will be turning 59 and the youngest will be turning 44. These are the 4.3 million Australians who have cut a swathe through Australian social, cultural, political and economic life. They have been the social pioneers, the iconoclasts, the revolutionaries, and they have paid a high emotional price, being our most highly-divorced generation ever, and the generation that absorbed most of the impact of the upheavals in the Australian economy over the past 15 years. How are they travelling now? How do leading-edge boomers feel about the looming prospect of turning 60? Where do they stand on the r-word?What are their attitudes to saving, investment, credit? How are their spending patterns likely to change – if at all? This is the generation that once said “we’re not here for a long time; we’re here for a good time”Â… but most of them are still here, so are they having a good time? Are their values changing as they age? How do they feel about the progress being made by their children? What are their dreams for the future?

More on the book itself next post…

Tsunami and Whose Sin?

It’s been fascinating, and yes disturbing, to be in conversations around the significance of the December 26 2004 tsunami.

I was at a meeting of teachers recently when a local Pentecostal minister gave us his version of the catastrophe. “It’s all about sin”, he told us. “The Bible tells us that the wages of sin is death. The people who died in the tsunami deserved to die. And before you shoot me down, I’ll qualify that by saying that we all deserve to die. Jesus came so that we wouldn’t have to suffer the consequences of our sinful nature.”

I nearly fell out of my chair. There is something desperately flawed in a gospel that tells us that Jesus died to save us from dying. The reality is that all of us are mortal – if we don’t end our lives through accident or illness, we end up wearing out. Is that because of sin? Honestly, I believe that there never was a time when humans were immortal. We don’t have a ‘pre-fall’ idyllic death-free existence to get back to. Sure, we have the story of Adam and Eve in which they are told that they would certainly ‘die’ the day they taste the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. But even from the story itself it is clear they do not literally die immediately. Something else dies – purity and innocence. The way we are created includes inbuilt fragility.

And then at a more mainstream denominational meeting when another minister suggested that the disastrous effects of the tsunami were linked with sin. “The consequences of spending so much money on armaments etc. when money could have been spent on predicting the impact of the earthquake and making sure people didn’t live so close to the sea.”

I responded by asking the question: “Who was to blame when Uluru burst out of the Australian rock? If there were people living in that area, did they think they had caused it to happen? And who was to blame when Australia’s continental plate tore away from the rest of Gondwanaland? Was it human sin that caused the many terrifying ruptures involved in that split?”

The reality is that we are fragile beings living in an exciting but dangerous world.

Why are we in such a hurry to assign blame and shame when things go wrong?

That must have been going through Jesus’ mind as he found a man who had been born blind. It’s all in John 9. Jesus’ followers ask him, “Teacher, whose sin caused this man to be born blind – his own sin or his parents’ sin.”

And Jesus gives an answer that makes it clear that they’ve been asking the wrong question. “It’s not this man’s sin nor his parents’ sin”. Trying to find out ‘why’ things have happened usually gets us nowhere unless there’s a way of preventing it happening again.

What’s more helpful is the purpose question. What purpose can we now find in the present situation? What is God going to make out of this?

And Jesus goes on to find God’s purpose in the man’s blindness. “God’s power can be shown in this man”. Jesus proceeds to find a way to bring the man his sight – an earthy approach that involves dust and spit and washing.

So what’s the most helpful question to be exploring in this time? “Who’s to blame for the tsunami?” Or “How can we be involved in God’s purposes in the wake of the disaster? How can we live in a way that makes it possible for those affected to have an ongoing living?”